Genealogy & Family History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for expert genealogists and people interested in genealogy or family history. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The banns for the marriage of Albert Herbert William Proctor and Julia Ann Coulson were read on the 6th, 13th and 20th October 1908, which were 3 consecutive Tuesdays. According to Lord Hardwick's Act (Marriage Act 1753) banns were meant to be read on Sundays. Were Sundays a strict requirement, or did the banns only need to be read during a service, which could happen on other days of the week?

share|improve this question

A rapid scan of Marriage Law for Genealogists the definitive guide by Rebecca Probert (Probert, Rebecca Marriage Law for Genealogists the definitive guide. Kenilworth: Takeaway (Publishing), 2009.) suggests that although Banns were supposed to be read on Sundays, the marriage would still be valid -- i.e. 'Sunday Banns' are a directory requirement, not a mandatory one. Failure to comply with a mandatory requirement renders the marriage void, whereas directory requirements are desirable but not fundamental.

I thoroughly recommend the Probert book for the nitty-gritty of English and Welsh marriage laws and reality from 1600 on.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.