Timeline for How to handle indirect family?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2012 at 13:57 | vote | accept | warren | ||
| Oct 12, 2012 at 6:08 | comment | added | Fortiter | Jeremy, your statement "no longer legally the birth parent" describes exactly the same situation asin any other adoption in Queensland. The legal relationship is broken but the genetic link to the birth parent remains. The requirements to record this are no different to a "standard" adoption (if there is such a thing). | |
| Oct 10, 2012 at 14:24 | comment | added | bstpierre | @Jeremy: Gramps allows you to specify the relationship between a child and its parent. By default it shows up at "Birth", but you could choose from the list it provides as "Adopted" or enter a special name for this circumstance. | |
| Oct 10, 2012 at 11:28 | comment | added | Jeremy | Can any program handle the older situation in Queensland, Australia, where if a biological parent with child married and the new spouse adopted the child, both parents became legally the adoptive parents. The biological parent was no longer legally the birth parent. | |
| Oct 10, 2012 at 5:38 | history | answered | lkessler | CC BY-SA 3.0 |