Timeline for Y-DNA haplogroup R1a1ab2 Z93 Z94 in England?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2017 at 23:50 | comment | added | George Gaál | Ah, sorry, their names look the same :-) Everybody tries to make it's own DNA company, so mess takes place. Thanks for clarification. | |
| Mar 29, 2017 at 20:02 | comment | added | RobertShaw | @GeorgeGaál, Andrew used "Living DNA" for testing, not AncestryDNA. | |
| Mar 27, 2017 at 22:19 | comment | added | George Gaál | So if we don't know HOW AncestryDNA detected @Andrew Kett belongs to R-Z94, we can say nothing for sure. I hope that AncestryDNA guys are smart and don't use SWAG technology, but number of SNPs from their custom chip typical to one particular clade/subclade to make claims that somebody belongs it. | |
| Mar 27, 2017 at 22:16 | comment | added | George Gaál | Also I am not sure about quality of SNP testing of Y chr with the help of Illumina chips. The most famous project using this kind of chips is NatGeno Geno2.0. It has a LOT of problems. Beginning from misread SNPs and homology of SNPs between different clades. It is serious task to find the place of tested person on Y tree. Taking in account that there are different versions of Y tree and they all are updated with time. Brh. So the best choice (but rather expensive!!!) to investigate somebody's direct paternal line is to order NGS test like BigY or FGS Y-Elite. | |
| Mar 24, 2017 at 21:40 | comment | added | Andrew Kett | Thank you so much Robert brilliant answer! very kind of you to go to so much trouble for me, | |
| Mar 24, 2017 at 21:38 | vote | accept | Andrew Kett | ||
| Mar 23, 2017 at 18:47 | history | answered | RobertShaw | CC BY-SA 3.0 |