Timeline for Is DNA match between two parties that ought not be related by "blood" possible?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2018 at 1:08 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackGenealogy/status/951259400504832000 | ||
| Jan 5, 2018 at 5:13 | history | edited | PolyGeo♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 53 characters in body
|
| Jan 5, 2018 at 4:23 | answer | added | lkessler | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 5, 2018 at 3:31 | comment | added | BobE | @Jan Murphy Yes only Ancestry and No, I have not, and I suspect my "match has not. | |
| Jan 5, 2018 at 1:05 | comment | added | Jan Murphy♦ | Are you only using AncestryDNA? Have you and your match downloaded your raw data and uploaded it anywhere you could use third-party tools? | |
| Jan 5, 2018 at 0:47 | comment | added | BobE | only info available: "30.0 centimorgans shared across 1 DNA segment" - | |
| Jan 4, 2018 at 22:50 | history | edited | PolyGeo♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Jan 4, 2018 at 22:18 | comment | added | George Gaál | Please provide more information about the match: the total amount of shared DNA and the longest shared segment. I ask because it is very important. If the numbers are low there is no confirmed relationship (but it may still exists and the relation is 5th or more cousins). | |
| Jan 4, 2018 at 21:39 | history | asked | BobE | CC BY-SA 3.0 |