Skip to main content
4 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 24, 2018 at 17:34 vote accept WilliamKF
Apr 22, 2018 at 22:31 comment added Harry V. @Jan Right, there is no mention of in-laws here. "In-law" was commonly omitted, as I suspect in this case, when it would not be in modern usage
Apr 22, 2018 at 22:06 comment added Jan Murphy "in-law" relationships in documents from this period are not likely to have the modern meaning. genealogy.stackexchange.com/a/5342/1006
Apr 22, 2018 at 5:05 history answered Harry V. CC BY-SA 3.0