Skip to main content
31 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 25, 2018 at 15:02 answer added sean007 timeline score: 0
Feb 7, 2016 at 15:09 history edited user104
edited tags
Feb 7, 2016 at 12:59 history edited Harry V.
edited tags
Feb 6, 2016 at 17:23 history edited user104
edited tags
Apr 21, 2013 at 6:26 answer added Colin timeline score: 3
S Dec 28, 2012 at 19:34 history bounty ended CommunityBot
S Dec 28, 2012 at 19:34 history notice removed CommunityBot
Dec 21, 2012 at 7:37 answer added lkessler timeline score: 1
Dec 21, 2012 at 5:34 answer added lkessler timeline score: 2
Dec 21, 2012 at 5:07 answer added lkessler timeline score: 2
Dec 20, 2012 at 17:58 history edited user104 CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 17 characters in body; edited title
S Dec 20, 2012 at 17:57 history bounty started CommunityBot
S Dec 20, 2012 at 17:57 history notice added user104 Authoritative reference needed
Dec 20, 2012 at 17:48 comment added user104 @ACProctor (and anyone else that's interested) I've set up a chat at chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/6808/… to discuss this.
Dec 20, 2012 at 17:06 comment added user104 @ACProctor, incidentally in the two examples where I've done exhaustive searches/cross-checks in both set of indices the matches have been very good (here and in North Wales). I've read Mike Foster's excellent books so suspect I've just been lucky.
Dec 20, 2012 at 17:04 comment added user104 @ACProctor There's actually a very good match for the Dudley registrations in this period between local and GRO indexes, other than for the unnamed . WestMidlandsBMD have the extra unnamed female that you found (with a corresponding death in the same district and quarter of an unnamed girl). There's also an unnamed female born and dying in 1861 but no other unnameds that show up on either set of indices.
Dec 20, 2012 at 16:46 comment added ACProctor I'm deliberately not using the GRO index here (e.g. via FreeBMD) because of missing entries and mis-indexing. That's why I pointed to the ukbmd site. Which source are you using here?
Dec 20, 2012 at 16:26 comment added user104 @ACproctor I can't find two unnamed Harper girls between 1864-1866, only one for whom there is a corresponding death in the same quarter (Mar 1864).
Dec 20, 2012 at 16:19 comment added user104 @ACProctor, I had all the Dudley births of a Mary Harper between 1859 and 1870 reference checked (back when the GRO still did that). None of them that are plain Mary or Mary Ann have a father James or unnamed. I should follow up on the unnamed ones.
Dec 20, 2012 at 10:22 comment added ACProctor You probably know already but it's worth adding a note that the registration district of Dudley is also associatd with Worcestershire, and more recently 'West-Midlands' (ukbmd.org.uk/genuki/reg/districts/dudley.html)
Dec 20, 2012 at 10:00 comment added ACProctor Thanks for adding the extra information in the title. The ukbmd site, mentioned below, finds 3 Mary A births registered in Dudley in 1865-66, and 2 unnamed Harper girls between 1864-66.
Dec 20, 2012 at 9:53 history edited user104 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 139 characters in body
Dec 20, 2012 at 9:43 history edited user104 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1406 characters in body; edited title
Dec 20, 2012 at 8:59 answer added ACProctor timeline score: 5
Nov 7, 2012 at 19:44 vote accept CommunityBot moved from User.Id=104 by developer User.Id=204
Dec 20, 2012 at 9:43
Oct 31, 2012 at 1:02 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackGenealogy/status/263445775844012033
Oct 11, 2012 at 17:09 answer added Andrew timeline score: 3
Oct 11, 2012 at 2:45 history edited Rob Hoare
edited tags
Oct 10, 2012 at 21:36 answer added Rob Hoare timeline score: 10
Oct 10, 2012 at 15:09 answer added TomH timeline score: 11
Oct 10, 2012 at 14:49 history asked user104 CC BY-SA 3.0