Timeline for How to deal with inaccurate obituaries so I'm not perpetuating the errors?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:54 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://genealogy.stackexchange.com/ with https://genealogy.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Nov 14, 2012 at 20:05 | history | edited | GeneJ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 264 characters in body
|
| Nov 14, 2012 at 3:42 | history | edited | GeneJ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Nov 14, 2012 at 3:40 | comment | added | GeneJ | @Luke, :-) How cool is that! I didn't mean to suggest the tally in Mildred's obituary was incorrect. In the example Rusty gave, one infers there is a mistake. (And, I'm sure there have been many errors over the years in such tallies.) | |
| Nov 14, 2012 at 3:37 | comment | added | Luke_0 | The tally of the descendants is correct (I myself am one of the 40). | |
| Nov 14, 2012 at 0:56 | history | edited | GeneJ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected link
|
| Nov 13, 2012 at 17:06 | history | edited | GeneJ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
| Nov 13, 2012 at 16:59 | history | edited | GeneJ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1589 characters in body
|
| Nov 13, 2012 at 4:39 | history | edited | GeneJ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1577 characters in body
|
| Nov 13, 2012 at 2:42 | comment | added | GeneJ | Will edit my answer now to add the notion of "certainty." In all cases, though, I have the option of commenting in the reference note. | |
| Nov 13, 2012 at 2:38 | comment | added | Rusty Erpenbeck | I thought of using [sic], but that only tells other family researchers that I consider it wrong. It doesn't give them a means to further research these sisters, if so desired. | |
| Nov 13, 2012 at 2:35 | history | edited | GeneJ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 52 characters in body
|
| Nov 13, 2012 at 2:30 | history | answered | GeneJ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |