Timeline for In 17th century Scotland/Virginia, could a Jr. have a different name than his father?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 9, 2015 at 22:29 | history | edited | PolyGeo♦ |
edited tags
|
|
S Sep 20, 2015 at 21:36 | history | bounty ended | PolyGeo♦ | ||
S Sep 20, 2015 at 21:36 | history | notice removed | PolyGeo♦ | ||
Sep 19, 2015 at 14:17 | answer | added | Harry V.♦ | timeline score: 3 | |
Sep 14, 2015 at 0:11 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackGenealogy/status/643215427389272064 | ||
S Sep 13, 2015 at 22:32 | history | bounty started | PolyGeo♦ | ||
S Sep 13, 2015 at 22:32 | history | notice added | PolyGeo♦ | Draw attention | |
Aug 22, 2015 at 17:24 | comment | added | AdrianB38 | I might say in answer to the original question that appending Junior to the name of a grandson when the grandfather is already dead makes no sense. But that's me being logical. | |
Aug 22, 2015 at 17:20 | comment | added | AdrianB38 | Sorry my only Scottish junior / senior combination dates from the mid 1800s and they were father and son. We are constantly told not to assume such pairs are father and son but I can't provide an instance of this in the British Isles. | |
Aug 22, 2015 at 7:55 | comment | added | Jan Murphy♦ | For the United States, see Inferring father/son relationships from Senior (Sr.) / Junior (Jr.) naming? -- but for this question, perhaps our members with experience researching in Scotland could address the usage there? | |
Aug 22, 2015 at 3:21 | history | asked | Ellen Spertus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |