4

I have recently inherited a box of various documents and photos. I know the importance of archival-quality photo pages and sleeves, but is there any advantage to using archival-quality binders along with those pages?

I have several good, sturdy (but maybe not 'archive safe') binders already available that I could use, and would like to use them if possible.

The binders would be placed in a storage box, and not on a shelf, so a binder cover would not strictly be necessary, at least for the time being.

2

You use an archival-quality binder for the same reason you'd use other archival-quality materials. You don't want low-quality materials to outgas or to leach acid or other unwanted byproducts into the box that is holding the materials you want to archive.

The standard for storing and displaying photographic materials is the Photographic Activity Test (PAT).

Gaylord Archival's page that describes the specifications for their products includes the following notice:

Most of our storage materials have been submitted and passed the test. The absence of the logo does not indicate that a product has failed the P.A.T., as some products have not yet been tested.

You don't know the provenance of the binders you already have. You don't know the materials they were made of, or how they'll perform under the conditions your photos will be stored under. Yes, the sleeves and any materials that come directly in contact should be the highest priority, but over time as your budget allows, why not get archival binders and boxes too?

Against the cost of good quality archival materials, consider the time and expense involved with trying to restore photos which have been damaged by improper storage.

Resources:

From Caring for Records at the Georgia State Archives:

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.