I'm struggling to read part of an 1841 census record:Census image

The difficult element is at the far right of the line for Saml Brown Gamekeeper (in the column headed Where born in Scotland Ireland or Foreign Parts). I'm not sure it says Scotland or Ireland -- it looks to me as if it begins with an E and then maybe a long s followed by another s and then ex -- which would make Essex, but would that qualify as foreign parts! (His wife was from Essex as well...)

The census reference is HO107 piece 0434 book 9 folio 31 page 22 . This particular image comes off Findmypast.

  • Definitely an "E." Essex is a good guess.
    – Cyn
    Dec 29, 2018 at 21:31
  • Agreed. The small 'e' looks like the other small 'e's in the other text in the image, and that last letter is definitely an 'x'.
    – user5836
    Dec 30, 2018 at 23:10

1 Answer 1


I agree that it is "Essex". The word isn't that clear, but if you browse other pages in that set you can see several more entries in that column, that are similar to the one posted and look more obviously like "Essex". There are also a couple of "Suffolk"s and I think an "Orkney" in addition to the more usual "Ireland". Not everyone marked as born outside the county gets this level of detail, though, and it's not immediately obvious why some do. Several census entries are marked as "Lodger" in the left column too, which is a bit unusual. Perhaps some householders volunteered the extra information on their Household Schedule form, and the enumerator transcribed it onto the Enumeration Schedule.

A July 2018 LostCousins newsletter links to a May 2013 article in "The Local Historian" which describes some rare surviving Household Schedules and a comparison to the Enumeration Schedules. Even in a small sample, there was considerable variation in how both forms were completed, and in the amount of information provided.

The householders' and enumerators were instructed to put simply "S", "I" or "F" in this column, for "Scotland", "Ireland" or "Foreign Parts" respectively. This census enumerator (Edward Parsons, according to the same record set images on Ancestry) clearly liked to put a little additional data in his census books. Raise a glass to him. :)

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.