3

I have traced one of my ancestors to this particular individual, but the trail goes dead and other family trees have gone with, what i perceive as incorrect. James Borland, married Janet Livingtone in 1855 in Glasgow. The marriage certificate states the following information: He is 24 (thus born circa 1831), born in Strathaven, Lanarkshire. His father is also James Borland, deceased, his mother is Margaret Boag. Now I cannot find a birth record for James Borland around 1831. I found a death record that is almost certainly is him as it lists Janet Livingstone as his wife, James borland as his father… but Anne Milne as his mother. So, I did some research thinking maybe Margaret Boag had died and Anne Milne was his new mother, but the only Anne Borland and James Borland I can find are alive and well in the 1861 and 1871 census. (Remember James Borland was listed as deceased in James Borland’s marriage certificate in 1855)

I am at a bit of a dead end as to how a marriage certificate and death certificate for the same person can list 2 different mothers.

Can anyone give an idea how to validate the facts here?

1
  • Who was the informant of the death certificate? It seems unlikely, but it is possible that whomever informed the registrar got their facts crossed.
    – user5836
    May 29 at 0:02

2 Answers 2

2

In an answer to a different question on this site, one of our community members once said:

At one time or another, I suppose most of us have suffered from premature connectivitis syndrome (PCS)--we don't really know enough yet by which we can well identify a person, yet we want to connect them to a much earlier place in time.

The wise advice given started with:

Work from a time line on which you specify locations (and/or events). Pick the point on the timeline where you feel you have solid information; begin there. When you move from that point in time, think INCHWORM (rather than leapfrog).

Especially with modern-day genealogy, where we access so many records online, websites try to make it easier for us by indexing names and encouraging us to search for records by name. Very often in the process, context is lost and sometimes it is difficult to determine what records we are looking at.

The problem is compounded when sites like Scotland's People (or findmypast with the 1921 Census of England and Wales) attempt to make family history more affordable for us by charging on a pay-as-you-go basis. Theoretically we pay only for the records we need -- but PAYGO makes comprehensive studies of either places (One-Place Studies) or surnames (One-Name Studies) expensive for the casual researcher.

To sort out a possible same-name problem, it helps to build a table, chart or spreadsheet that summarizes the information of all the sources you have looked at so far. Try to collect as many identifiers as you can for all the individuals mentioned on each document. Original signatures on documents are prized (when we can get them) because sometimes comparing the signatures on documents can disambiguate which document belongs to which individual.

The Genealogical Proof Standard consists of five elements:

  1. Reasonably exhaustive research.
  2. Complete and accurate source citations.
  3. Thorough analysis and correlation.
  4. Resolution of conflicting evidence.
  5. Soundly written conclusion based on the strongest evidence

It might be easier to resolve the conflicting evidence if you had more evidence to look at -- in other words, if you learned more about the individuals involved in the records you've collected. Take the records you already have and "wring them out" to get all the possible clues -- the addresses at which people lived, the occupations of the individuals, etc. and make a list of all the identifiers that might help you distinguish your subject from someone else with the same name. (You've already made a great start by saying "the cerfiticate states the following information" instead of automatically attributing the information to your research subjects.)

Think about what other record sets might shed light on your question. Have you looked for wills and testaments, house history information, accounts in newspapers, or other record sets beside birth, marriage and death records?

For research in Scotland, I highly recommend the free (donations welcomed) conferences hosted by Emma and Graham Maxwell of Scottish Indexes. The conferences are a wonderful way to learn more about researching in Scottish Records. Some presenations and handouts from past conferences are available on the Past Conferences page. Watching case studies can be especially helpful for getting ideas about new record sets to search.

Resources:

1

Did you look at all the census records of James and his potential father? In 1841, James b. 1801 and Anne had a son James age 11 in their household. When I look at them in 1861, I see that both James b. 1831 and James b. 1801 married to Anne are living in the hamlet of Flemington, Strathaven, a few houses apart, and both were in the textile trade. Both had a son Alexander so James jr. apparently named a child after his brother. Indirect evidence like this can help build a case.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.