2

I use Ancestry for my family tree and consistently for all women I have then with their maiden surname.

I have a case where on her birth certificate it was:

  • Fanny Priscilla Selby

On the 1921 census she is:

  • Priscilla Rees

I know that she is Rees because she got married. At the moment I have associated this record with "Fanny Priscilla Selby".

I was going to add a alternate name into Ancestry "Priscilla Selby" but that felt wrong because that is not what the document says. And using "Priscilla Rees" feels wrong as all the women are listed with maiden surnames.

This was not a problem for the men. For example, her son is Haydn on this entry and later on Hayden. Easy to have two name variations.

Do I just add the variation as Priscilla Selby?

2
  • 1
    Re "what the document says". That's important but remember that your alternate names are your conclusions not quotes from sources. So feel free to write a conclusion that is a composite of bits from various sources
    – AdrianB38
    Commented Jul 2, 2022 at 16:02
  • @AdrianB38 I do have her BMD certificates. And her obituary from a scanned newspaper. Commented Jul 2, 2022 at 16:11

1 Answer 1

3

Ancestry online trees allow the users to record multiple names. Users can display them by going to the Filter drop down menu above the Facts column on the left-hand side of the profile, and then choosing Name and Gender. If you have entered more than one name, select Alternate Facts as well.

Very often we discover records with a person's married name first, such as a census. Suppose we are starting with the 1921 Census, where the name on the record is Priscilla Rees.

My preference is to attach the record with the name as shown on the record first. For the 1911 Census, I might attach the record in the ordinary fashion, which links the associated source to the name (and records the event as a Residence). If I am creating a custom Census event, there may not be a source to associate with this event, but I can write down where the name came from in the person's Notes (private) or leave a Comment (public). If I have seen the record on findmypast, I often copy the address and the transcription of a person's entry into the description field for the event, so the name appearing on the record is shown on the profile.

However, it is usually suggested that we record women by their maiden names. Suppose I don't know the maiden name yet. In that case, my next step is to add a name "Priscilla" with no surname and mark that as the preferred name. Some users dislike leaving the surname field entirely blank. Crista Cowan has stated in one of her "Barefoot Genealogy" videos (on the Ancestry Desktop Education Playlist on Ancestry's YouTube Channel) that entering five underscores to indicate the field is blank on purpose will not interfere with Ancestry's search and hint algorithms. Using abbreviations such as UNK for unknown or LNU (last name unknown) is not good practice (see the Further Reading section).

Further along in the resarch process, I might acquire the birth certificate from the GRO, and add the name Fanny Priscilla Selby. Ancestry has a feature where we can add sources for items that aren't found on Ancestry, but I don't use it for reasons that aren't relevant to this answer; my full citations are in my desktop software, Family Historian. Instead, I make a note in the description of the corresponding event to remind myself where that form of the name was seen. I could also use the Notes or Comments. The advantage of putting it in a description field is that the information is visible and preserved if I print the profile to a PDF.

If the information comes from a baptism record, I usually put a mini-transcription of the register in the description field, "Fanny Priscilla daughter of [parents] Selby" with a note like "fmp image" to note that I've seen it.

Finally, suppose I knew from personal knowledge (either my own, or people who knew her personally) that Priscilla hated the name "Fanny" and always went by Priscilla. In this case, I would enter the name Priscilla Selby and mark it as the Preferred name, again leaving a Note or Comment (or both) to record how I knew that was the case.

Do what works for you. Whatever you choose to do, do keep a record somewhere with a list of the variant names you've seen, noting which sources they came from. One of the downsides of the online Ancestry tree system is that it is very easy to over-write the preferred name when attaching records, and thus getting the associations of which source has which names muddled. If you keep a separate list in Notes, you can go back and fix things when a merge clobbers your prefered name.

Further Reading

From Tamura Jones' Modern Software Experience:

From Ancestry Support:

4
  • 1
    Hi Jan, paragraph 4 has a stray "Once I" at the end. Was there another thought, or did it go into the next paragraph?
    – shoover
    Commented Jun 26, 2022 at 2:26
  • +1 Thanks for your thorough explanations. Commented Jun 26, 2022 at 12:30
  • 2
    @shoover Thanks for catching that! I think I changed my mind about how to start the next paragraph, but I'll re-read the answer and make sure I didn't leave anything out.
    – Jan Murphy
    Commented Jun 26, 2022 at 20:51
  • 1
    @AndrewTruckle I've updated the answer fill out the picture of what usually happens.
    – Jan Murphy
    Commented Jun 26, 2022 at 21:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.